Turkish author writes on hatred in Turkish-Armenian relations
Hatred Translated by the Zoryan Institute I will describe an incident on Saturday, February 5, at a
conference about the “Armenian Problem,” which took place at the Yapi Kredi
Cultural Center, organized by the Helsinki Citizens’ Committee. The purpose of
the conference was to find means to solve the “problem”, to make it normal, or
to discuss it as civilized human beings. Historian Mete Tunçay and Fethiye Çetin,
the author-lawyer whose biographical book My Grandmother was recently published,
gave speeches. Mete Tuncay explained the various theses, writings and
meetings concerning Turkey and the Armenian Question in recent years. He spoke
very calmly…and then he gave his personal opinion about the subject, which is as
follows: While the Turkish Republic completely rejects the negative heritage of
the Ottoman Empire, it adopts and owns the Ottoman’s stance in the Armenian
Genocide issue, mainly because of the new republic founders’ gains of Armenians’
property and possessions, as well as their concern in preserving their new-found
wealth. It is meaningless to debate whether a genocide took place or not, and
equally meaningless for the parliaments of other countries to recognize the
genocide, when neither Armenia nor Turkey are ready to discuss this subject.
Fethiye Çetin spoke about two different issues. First, she
explained the continuing bias and discrimination against Armenians in the legal
and education fields. Secondly, she expressed her feelings and Turkish
Armenians’ feelings about the subject of her new book, her grandmother, who
revealed just before she died that she was an Armenian rescued by a Turkish
sergeant during the massacres. She also spoke very calmly…and she finished her
remarks by expressing her hope that the ‘genocide’ discussions would be replaced
by a bit of empathy for the Armenians’ sorrows. Soon after Mete Tunçay began his speech, someone from the
audience, who claimed to be an ‘historian’ and a member of Aydınlar Ocağı
(“Society of Intellectuals”), interrupted Tunçay with remarks such as “you are
wrong, it is not true.” Then, a second person, whose name we discovered
afterwards to be Ramazan Bakkal began interrupting the speech. Mete Tunçay
suggested that Bakkal should step forward and join the lines at the podium, but
Bakkal preferred to sit in the audience and continue interrupting from there.
The tension in the conference hall began to increase. As
the “corrections” and “warnings” of Bakkal became increasingly disruptive, the
audience repeatedly requested Bakkal’s removal, so that they could follow the
speakers. The Yapi Kredi security guards invited Bakkal to leave the hall and
Bakkal started raging. A brief background note. Apparently Bakkal is an
“important person.” According to his own account, he is a former Turkish state
radio producer, a founder of ASAM, a director of Turkish Public Community
Committees and an editor of Strategic Analysis Magazine, that is, a rather
“intellectual” person. That is why he felt he had the right to interrupt this
conference. In addition, he has had another “heroic” incident recently. In
December 2004, when EU Parliament’s President, Joseph Barrel, indicated his
desire to meet Leyla Zana in Diyarbakir during a meeting organized by TOBB and
IKV, Bakkal had similar actions and remarks, such as, “I will teach him a lesson
that he deserves;” “I will not allow you to go to Diyarbakir;” “I will not allow
division of Turkey.” Lots of swearing, pushing and shoving and being ejected by
hotel security guards. (For more comments and two different interpretations of
this incident, please visit
www.bbp.org.tr, Funda Ozkan’s
December 7, 2004 news item in the daily newspaper, Radikal:
www.radikal.com.tr) So Ramazan Bakkal is a professional and national
“conference protester.” But perhaps due to the less professional conduct of the
HYD conference security guards, Mr. Bakkal’s fists were more effective this
time. As far as I could see, he managed to slap one woman in the audience, knock
out another man trying to prevent him from attacking Tunçay, to hurl a large
plastic sign at Tunçay, to hurl a bottle at a security guard. He gave an
excellent performance… Anyway, even though the security guards took him out of
the conference room, he managed to come in again (escorted by a policeman
somehow)…During the question period, he and another elderly person from the
“Society of Intellectuals,” Aydınlar Ocağı, had long tirades with statements
like, “The Turkish nation is the most tolerant and understanding people but
beware not to wear out their patience,” or “if you betray us, we will do the
same again” and they did their duty of “warning….” Some urban and modern ladies among the audience also
complained to the conference speakers by asking, “Why do you bring up these
subjects? What will you achieve? Don’t talk about it anymore, let’s forget about
the past.” At the end, despite the violent and disrespectful persons,
despite the professional conference protesters’ actions and the tension created,
despite the people who would have preferred if this conference had never taken
place (I wonder why they came if they did not what the conference), the
conference ended with prolonged applause. The incidents that took place at this conference, the “EU
Minority Report,” which was torn up during a previous presentation, indicates an
extraordinary fear and paranoia. Paranoia, fed by fear, is now feeding a hatred
which is spreading fear everywhere. Paranoid persons are so full of violence…and
they justify their violence by saying “We won’t allow this in our homeland!” As
if being patriotic is only in their domain… “Violence” is not only in conferences but also in
literature, even in simple poems that have become monuments of hatred built with
words and letters. For example, schoolbooks or supplementary educational books
prepared by Turkish Science Academy and Historical Society are full of racist
literature. There is a poetry book in the 1998 edition of the Turkish Literature
Series published by the National Education Ministry. The book, titled On This
Road, is authored by a poet named Yunus Zeyrek. Here is an excerpt: “The world did not witness such dishonor, Another excerpt: “Tell me, are you human, Armenian?” It is easy to understand that children or youth reading
these textbooks get influenced. But it is difficult to grasp this: how can a
person be this full of hatred against a people who have lived in the same
country, mixed with the same blood, almost becoming one? What is worse, this
hatred is blinding all other realities. This hatred is also covering up other
opportunistic dirt. For example, an incident at Isparta Süleyman Demiral
University (www.hurriyetim.com.tr, 4.1.2005). An academic from the History
Faculty, Ahmet Halaçoğlu, was alleged to sexually harass female students, as
well as taking nude pictures of a female student and sending these photos to
other faculty staff. When he was fired from the university, Halaçoğlu claimed he
was framed. The daily Hurriyet had the following news item related to
this issue: “She was like a man.” That’s because the female student whose
pictures were taken by Halaçoğlu walked and talked like a man and was unlikely
to get involved with this…of course Hurriyet is more interested in the
sensationalism of this news item. The affair between this woman and the “photographer” and
somehow “historian” does not interest us…but the method used by people in
trouble, murderers or robbers is what is interesting… Halaçoğlu’s former lawyer portrays him as a loyal follower
of Ataturk, progressive, modern, but also a God-fearing man who prays five times
daily. According to the lawyer, Halaçoğlu was framed in this scandal because his
older brother has been working on the Armenian Question. His friends in Isparta
also think that Halaçoğlu is a victim because of his brother’s book, which
claims that there was no Armenian Genocide, but on the contrary, a genocide of
Turks by the Armenians (a book published by Turkish Historic Society in
preparation for a war of historic documents against Armenians.) This incident shows that it is a good defensive mechanism
to bring out nationalist ideologies and policies. Nobody can easily blame you if
you hide behind these ideas; and you can continue to do your evil deeds and
spread your hatred from your sheltered refuge. So, I keep wondering: Are we
going to see the days when people in trouble will try to defend themselves by
saying “I am democratic, I believe in human rights?” But we are living in changing times. People who dared not
talk until today have started speaking out, that is, what is deemed “normal” is
finally becoming normal, and the ones who had prevented the talking are now
going through a crisis. They cannot tolerate hearing others talk, expressing
sorrow…In order not to hear them talk, they keep saying “First, look at what
they did to us,” meaning the Armenians, Americans, Russians, Greeks, Christians,
the missionaries, Kurds, Jews, that is, everyone except themselves…They keep
screaming louder, increasing the dosage of hatred, violence…and unfortunately,
the violence is not only in words….However, it is also becoming obvious that the
only thing they have left in their hands is their violence…
By Ferhat Kentel
Thursday, February 10, 2005
http://www.gazetem.net/ferhatkentel.asp
The Armenian from the Stone Age,
You have no good traits, the pen gets broken.
From wherever you look, the Armenian snake.”
You are even more base that the Muscovite
Your Armenian seeds from Mount Nemrut.”